Ekana Innovation

Passion for First

Banks think “different” business is bad and risky?

Posted by Janne Saarikko on October 14, 2008


I have to share with you an amazingly unbelievable story from US.

CITIZEN:Citizen, a company producing some of worlds coolest art and design products and having their works presented in MOMA’s of world, had their bank accounts closed by First Republic/Merrill Lynch due to unsuitability of their products. Copy-pasting the entire press release from CITIZEN:Citizen here:

 

 

The First Republic Bank has just issued notice that they are closing CITIZEN:Citizen’s bank accounts. The closure of the accounts was later discovered to have been activated by Merrill Lynch (owners of First Republic) whose legal department states that the type of products CITIZEN:Citizen produces are unsuitable for the bank and thus unsuitable for business with Merrill Lynch.
No comment was available from First Republic nor Merrill Lynch. Their representatives were hesitant to reveal any further details about which objects of the internationally recognized art and design brand were cause to close the business’ accounts. While the work may not seem suitable for Merrill Lynch, just 10 blocks away from the main branch of First Republic in San Francisco, the work of CITIZEN:Citizen is on display at the SF MoMA as part of their permanent collection.

Within the same week that CITIZEN:Citizen’s accounts were closed, their work was acquired as part of the permanent collection of one of the world’s premier art museums—the MoMA in New York acquired CITIZEN:Citizen’s Ballistic Rose, a corsage made from ballistic nylon designed by Tobias Wong, one of the firm’s signature pieces. 

The colliding worlds of art and finance seem to be more and more bizarre. Only a few weeks ago, on the same day as famed investment institution Lehman Brothers collapsed, infamous British artist Damien Hirst sold over $200 million of his recent work at Sotheby’s. Incidents such as these question the role of banks and commerce in art and how fluid, undefined and, at times, unwarranted those crossovers are.

Philip Wood, the founder of CITIZEN:Citizen, reflected, “It’s a wonder why a move such as closing the accounts of CITIZEN:Citizen should be made. Can it be that CITIZEN:Citizen is really so provocative  as to deem such an action? I really can’t believe that our very own bank is closing our account due to the design and art objects we produce. The collection highlights and observes the boundaries between art, design and culture. In that pursuit, I never thought we’d be highlighted by the likes of Merrill Lynch as an obstacle to their commercial success. Any sort of moral high ground seems out of order after the debacle of the last few weeks.”

 

 

 

 

This is unbelievable. Is this truly the state of banking industry? To me this looks like they think they rule the world, and can do whatever they want. I’ve always believed in banks to be reliable partners for all your financial troubles. As long as you take care of your part, they’ll be there for you.

Unless there is some real good explanation to this, I suggest we initiate innovation process for replacing the bank system. Maybe we should back to barter trade or start dealing in squirrel skins?

I’m really looking forward any good explanation of non-suitability of CITIZEN:citizen products.

:(

 
 

 

About these ads

One Response to “Banks think “different” business is bad and risky?”

  1. [...] Lehdistötiedotteen tekstin amerikaksi voi lukea täältä. [...]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: